Friday, September 07, 2007

Why Jeopardy Sucks

I miss A-Team.

Not The A-Team, though I do think back fondly on the time they helped my uncle keep his farm by building a catapult out of a tractor. No, I mean, Academic Team, the Quiz Bowl-type competitive sport I lettered in way back in high school.

I recently read Prisoner of Trebekistan: A Decade in Jeopardy!, which is what brought all this to mind. I'll write up a better review just of the book later, but it really got me to reminiscing about my own trivia-champ career.

This was back in the days when I used to actually know things. A lot of things. We were three-time county champions, losing the fourth by a single sudden-death question. I made the All-County team twice, reaching the State Finals both times. John Quincy Adams. Bathosphere. Dulcimer. The Turn of the Screw. Schubert. The square root of seven.

God, it was such an adrenaline rush.

You sat there, fingertips just sitting on the corners of the square red buzzer, every piece of your mind concentrating on the question, on your opponents, on the point totals, on how many 10-pointers you could drop and still make it up in the 15-point round. I loved every minute of it.

But the thing that sticks in my mind now, more than the sheer exhilaration of it, was the teamwork. You sat with your finger on the buzzer, thinking about a million things, but you were also thinking about the other three people at your table.

By the time you reached the finals, you had a team of six people, with two alternates. You knew them all backwards and forwards. The ones who were great on the fast 5-pointers but who would drop the high-scoring ones. The ones who knew obscure facts but were too slow to win the trigger rounds. The ones who knew music, who knew science, who knew books. Who could do math in their head faster than a calculator.

We supported each other. We would give up the buzzer to one we knew could do the best, pulling our hands back. We would say, "you know this," if they did, "are you sure?" if they were overreaching. Sometimes we would buzz in for each other, to force an answer from a teammate who had less faith in himself than we did.

There was no blame. In one State semifinal, one of my teammates dropped 3 15-pointers in a row, dropping us from first to fourth in a close game. We just told him to "shake it off and get back in the game." Mistakes were more easily forgiven when other people made them, rather than ourselves. I still remember questions I dropped. I don't remember the ones my teammates did.

The State tournament was always held at Disney world. I remember spending three days at Disney, having a blast with friends -- some I'd known for years, some brand new -- and at some point, answering some questions. When we had to take team photos, we made an Abbey Road homage and pretended Matt was stuck under a truck. We planned our rock band, Sporadic Lemon, led by our Music & Arts guy. It was great fun. I don't even remember how well we did that year; I just remember going to Epcot China wearing my Mao hat and singing on the monorail.

I miss A-Team. I miss my team. I miss having a team at all.

And I miss getting questions right.

Read More...

1 comments:

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Invisible Woman

This washed up in my email inbox, and I couldn't help put take a poke at it. The story/inspirational poem is called "Invisible Woman", and my response to it is after it. (The response also refers to some comments made by others about the same piece, but I think they're clear from context.)


First, the story itself:

Perspective: The Invisible Woman

By Nicole Johnson

It started to happen gradually. One day I was walking my son Jake to school. I was holding his hand and we were about to cross the street when the crossing guard said to him, "Who is that with you, young fella?"

"Nobody," he shrugged. Nobody? The crossing guard and I laughed. My son is only 5, but as we crossed the street I thought, "Oh my goodness, nobody?"

I would walk into a room and no one would notice. I would say something to my family - like "Turn the TV down, please" - and nothing would happen.

Nobody would get up, or even make a move for the remote. I would stand there for a minute, and then I would say again, a little louder, "Would someone turn the TV down?" Nothing.

Just the other night my husband and I were out at a party. We'd been there for about three hours and I was ready to leave. I noticed he was talking to a friend from work. So I walked over, and when there was a break in the conversation, I whispered, "I'm ready to go when you are."

He just kept right on talking.

That's when I started to put all the pieces together. I don't think he can see me. I don't think anyone can see me. I'm invisible. it all began to make sense, the blank stares, the lack of response, the way one of the kids will walk into the room while I'm on the phone and ask to be taken to the store. Inside I'm thinking, "Can't you see I'm on the phone?"

Obviously not. No one can see if I'm on the phone, or cooking, or sweeping the floor, or even standing on my head in the corner, because no one can see me at all.

I'm invisible.

Some days I am only a pair of hands, nothing more: Can you fix this? Can you tie this? Can you open this? Some days I'm not a pair of hands; I'm not even a human being. I'm a clock to ask, "What time is it?" I'm a satellite guide to answer, "What
number is the Disney Channel?" I'm a car to order, "Right around 5:30, please."

I was certain that these were the hands that once held books and the eyes that studied history and the mind that graduated summa cum laude - but now they had disappeared into the peanut butter, never to be seen again.

She's going, she's going, she's gone!

One night, a group of us were having dinner, celebrating the return of a friend from England . Janice had just gotten back from a fabulous trip, and she was going on and on about the hotel she stayed in. I was sitting there, looking around at the others all put together so well.

It was hard not to compare and feel sorry for myself as I looked down at my out-of-style dress; it was the only thing I could find that was clean. My unwashed hair was pulled up in a banana clip and I was afraid I could actually smell peanut butter in it. I was feeling pretty pathetic, when Janice turned to me with a beautifully wrapped package, and said, "I brought you this."

It was a book on the great cathedrals of Europe . I wasn't exactly sure why she'd given it to me until I read her inscription: "To Charlotte , with admiration for the greatness of what you are building when no one sees."

In the days ahead I would read - no, devour - the book. And I would discover what would become for me, four life-changing truths, after which I could pattern my work: * No one can say who built the great cathedrals - we have no record of their names.
* These builders gave their whole lives for a work they would never see finished.
* They made great sacrifices and expected no credit.
* The passion of their building was fueled by their faith that the eyes of God saw everything.

A legendary story in the book told of a rich man who came to visit the cathedral while it was being built, and he saw a workman carving a tiny bird on the inside of a beam. He was puzzled and asked the man, "Why are you spending so much time carving that bird into a beam that will be covered by the roof? No one will ever see it." And the workman replied, "Because God sees."

I closed the book, feeling the missing piece fall into place. . No act of kindness you've done, no sequin you've sewn on, no cupcake you've baked, is too small for me to notice and smile over. You are building a great cathedral, but you can't see right now what it will become."

At times, my invisibility feels like an affliction. But it is not a disease that is erasing my life. It is the cure for the disease of my own self-centeredness. It is the antidote to my strong, stubborn pride. I keep the right perspective when I see myself as a great builder. As one of the people who show up at a job that they will never see finished, to work on something that their name will never be on. The writer of the book went so far as to say that no cathedrals could ever be built in our lifetime because there are so few people willing to sacrifice to that degree.

When I really think about it, I don't want my son to tell the friend he's bringing home from college for Thanksgiving, "My mom gets up at 4 in the morning and bakes homemade pies, and then she hand bastes a turkey for three hours and presses all the linens for the table." That would mean I'd built a shrine or a monument to myself. I just want him to want to come home. And then, if there is anything more to say to his friend, to add, "You're gonna love it there."

As mothers, we are building great cathedrals. We cannot be seen if we're doing it right. And one day, it is very possible that the world will marvel, not only at what we have built, but at the beauty that has been added to the world by the sacrifices of invisible women.



And now, my response to this load of crap:

I think the thing that bothered me most about the piece was the husband.

Kids I can understand -- kids are naturally self-centered and anyone who has
spent time with a teenager is aware that their brains are not yet fully formed.
I would hope that once they grow up and move out, they realize what their
mother did for them and appreciate it (as I did).

But where is the husband in this "cathedral" analogy? He's pre-fabricated.
What's she building there? Why does he get a free pass to treat her like dirt?
He's not five years old. He's not going to be any great monument to her
life's work. He's just a jerk. My suspicion: the biggest reason she is
invisible to her children is because she is invisible to her husband. I would
suspect that her husband does not particularly respect women.

I agree with Johanna about the self-destructive ideology of the cathedral
analogy. Yes, invisible people made great sacrifices to construct great
things. But wouldn't those cathedrals still be as great if we knew who built
them? We know who built the Empire State Building. Giving recognition does
not invalidate a sacrifice. Invisibility is not a requirement of greatness.

As for women who are happy devoting their lives to their families...I can only
speak from experience, which seems a bit different than yours, Val. My mom is
a stay-at-home, lives-for-her-family kind of mom. But she was never invisible
to us, mainly because she didn't let herself be. If we said, "make me a
sandwich", Mum would respond with "What'd your last one die of?", i.e. I am not your slave. If we referred to her in third person in front of her, we got
"She's the cat's mother. Who?" until we said it properly. (Can you tell my
mother is English? Weird folks). Calling her "nobody" was not even in the
realm of possibility.

Eleanor Roosevelt once said, "No one can take advantage of you without your
permission." I think the Invisible Woman has been giving everyone plenty of
permission. It's very clear in the story -- "Inside I'm thinking, 'Can't you
see I'm on the phone?'" Well, why didn't you just say it out loud? She's
allowed herself to become a martyr, and she takes pride in that fact. She's an
accomplice in her own subjugation.

She hasn't lost her identity. She's willingly given it up.

It's possible to be devoted to your family without losing your identity or
becoming a servant. And it's possible to be happy at the same time. But for
some people, it's more attractive to suffer in silence and take pride in their
own virtuous sacrifice. There's nothing you can do for those people except
pity them.




Any thoughts from the (nonexistent) peanut gallery?

Read More...

0 comments:

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Can I name my kid The Doctor?

I saw an article today about people naming their children after science fiction characters.

Granted, I'm a prime suspect for this kind of thing, but frankly I don't see what's wrong or new about it. I'm not saying we should name our kids ObiWan or Leeloo, but there's nothing wrong with a good Malcolm or Sarah Jane.

It's weird to me mainly because of the hypocrisy. In the olden days, people started naming their kids after Bible figures. I doubt that they thought God would love them better than kids named after flowers. I think it was because those were the stories that people connected to, that they believed in, that they cared deeply about. And the people in those stories had certain virtues that would hopefully be passed on to those sharing their names.

Why on Earth is the Bible the only book you are allowed to do that with? If the Bible speaks to you, you can name your kid Hezekiah and it's fine. If it's something like A Tale of Two Cities or Merchant of Venice, you can have maybe a Sydney or a Portia and it's eccentric. God forbid you're inspired by Ender's Game or Dune -- never mind that Andrew and Paul are perfectly acceptable Biblical names; it's the dark stain of science fiction that makes them verboten.

And that makes it painfully clear that it isn't the names, it's the reason behind them that is apparently so shocking. The examples the article gives are Neo, Trinity, Willow, and Xander. I know people named Xander, born pre-Whedon (short for Alexander). Willow is just as normal as Rose or Holly. But because it's from a tv show (a genre one at that), it becomes something shameful you've saddled your children with that will get them beat up on the playground.

I don't buy it.

We name our children after the stories that we connect to. In olden days that was folklore and Biblical stories. Now, it's television and film. Just because our culture has moved technologically doesn't mean it has in any way lost its power or resonance. A good story is a good story, in 2000 BC or AD.

Elijah was a prophet. He was bald. When children made fun of him, he called on the wrath of God to strike them down.

Personally, I'd rather name my kid after Elijah Bailey from Asimov's Caves of Steel. At least he wasn't a jackass.

Read More...

0 comments:

Monday, August 06, 2007

Misogyny Watch: Election Coverage

I'm annoyed, but I'm not really sure who to be annoyed with.

MSN ran a little article in their pop culture section about the fact that many presidential candidates are eager to appear on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. In particular, it quoted a Comedy Central executive on the matter:

"It's sort of an open invitation for candidates," said Michele Ganeless, Comedy Central's executive vice president and general manager. "Jon makes these guys feel comfortable. He provides them with an opportunity to reach an audience they don't always reach, which is young men."


Fine, except that young women watch the Daily Show too. In fact, Jon Stewart's become a bit of a sex symbol. I may not be able to back up the sex symbol part with numbers, but according to some stats cited in this study by the Pew Research Center, the Daily Show/Colbert Report audience is 46% female.

So who should I be annoyed at? Michele Ganeless, for ignoring half of Jon Stewart's audience, or the candidates, for only wanting to reach the male half? Or Ganeless again, for assuming that candidates only want to reach the male half?

Maybe I'm overthinking it, because the candidates reach out to young women all the time but the Daily Show is the only thing they have in common with young men. And maybe I, as a politically-savvy young female, managed to miss all the reaching out they were doing. But somehow I doubt that.

(However, I do suggest reading that study. It has a lot of interesting information about how informed the audiences of various news sources are. Colbert and Stewart rank right up at the top.)

Read More...

0 comments:

Things That Are Awesome: Chuck E. Cheez Rock

Some guy has got his hands on a set of animatronic animal musicians from Chuck E. Cheez and has done what any red-blooded American would do in that situation: programmed them to play Evanescence songs.

I think this might give me nightmares.

Read More...

0 comments:

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Pursuit of Science

Nothing says "I'm a real scientist" like hooking up an electroplating setup backwards and peeling all the gold off your sample.

It's now a very decorative pile of slag. Go me!

Read More...

0 comments:

Friday, July 20, 2007

Misogyny Watch: How's My Parking

Am I missing the joke here?

How's My Parking

When did this sort of crap become funny?

Read More...

1 comments:

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Things That Are Awesome: UK Quiz Shows

There is a new and glorious future for quiz shows!

After years of Jeopardy! reruns and Who Wants to Answer Easy Questions Slowly, there is a new game in town: Grand Slam, which takes the trivia champions of other games and puts them in head-to-head single elimination death matches.

I thought I was good at trivia, but oh my God you have to watch these guys:

Read More...

0 comments:

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Things That Are Awesome: Ryan vs Dorkman

Antarctica stuff is coming soon, I'm just too lazy to get it organized.

Meanwhile, a shout-out to Ryan vs Dorkman! I've been a huge fangirl of these two since their original lightsaber battle way back in 2003. It's what Star Wars should have been.

They've got a new one out now, which is 8,000 times more awesome. Watch! I command!

The oldie but goodie (watch it first if you've never seen them before)


And the new, how-could-they-be-this-awesome sequel!



I love these guys.

Read More...

0 comments:

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Antarctica, Part I: Argentina

Ushuaia points out that it is not entirely isolated from the rest of the world with this classy road sign.  Click for big!

The Journey Begins!

After a long night of last-minute packing, we set off to Buenos Aires by way of Miami. Things I needed but forgot to pack: Spanish language phrasebook.

Here are a few highlights of Argentina, or, as I like to call it, the Land of Ham and Cheese.

Warning: Long and very possibly boring blogpost behind the cut, with no penguin pictures.


When you think Argentina, you would normally think of beef. Or the tango. Or, if you were kind of strange, the rich fossil deposits in Patagonia including the Awesomasaurus.

My enduring memory will be the ham and cheese sandwiches.

Every single meal on the airplane, except dinner, consisted of a ham and cheese sandwich. Breakfast? Jamon con queso. Lunch? Jamon con queso. Snack? Jamon con freaking queso. Not a peanut in sight. By the time we touched down in Ushuaia I had five of the damn things in my backpack.

And the restaurant menus were basically divided into Meat, which referred to the racks of whole lamb carcasses roasting in every window, and Sandwiches, which meant a list of things like "Ham and Cheese with Onion" and "Ham and Cheese with Lettuce But Without Onion".

But I digress.


The Streets of Ushuaia - click for big!


The port where we would eventually catch our ship was Ushuaia, the Southernmost City in the World. This is apparently not a catchy enough catchphrase for the Ushuaians, so every object large enough to write on bears the slogan "Ushuaia: Fin Del Mundo!" which has that classy, apocalyptic sound that's all the rage in remote parts of the world.


So pretty!  Click for big!


Ushuaia is breathtakingly beautiful, nestled next to the water with streets trailing up into the mountains that surround it on all sides. Since we arrived a day early, we got to spend some time wandering about. We didn't get to hit the major tourist attractions (such as the historical prison or the Train to the End of the World), but the everyday sights weren't half bad.

A few points of interest:

* There are no mannequins in Ushuaia. All clothing is modeled by giant plastic penguins. In Christmastime, these penguins wear Santa hats.

* There is a diorama of a Yahgan Indian village outside the Territorial Museum of Tierra del Fuego. The plastic Indian in the diorama is naked. I did not discover this until I was zooming in on a picture I took of something else.

* There is an Argentine naval base in Ushuaia. They have a few intimidating little gunboats, one shipwreck, and one mast with rigging that is sticking up out of the ground for no apparent reason.

* The waiters there are some of the sweetest people in the world. They did a heroic job of understanding my incredibly awful Spanish and were even willing to pantomime animals and cuts of meat when necessary. They were also sweet to my Mom who spent her time in Argentina reciting "gracias" and "de nada" with varying emphasis and pronunciations over and over at random intervals. "Graci-AS. Gra-CI-as. GRA-cias. Graaaa-cias."

* There are no live penguins in Ushuaia. However, there are a billion stuffed, stone, ceramic, and painted penguins; five hundred stray dogs; and one guy in a penguin suit wandering around waving to people, having his picture taken, and watching women's asses as they walk away.

* The Artisan's Promenade rocks the socks off any tourist souvenir stand in the city. I bought a little stuffed llama that was knit from actual llama wool by the llama owners themselves. In return, the knitter/owner showed me pictures of her with the llama at their farm in northern Argentina. Llama is very fun word to say in any language.

I wish I'd had more time to spend there, but I'm glad I got to sight-see some before we had to get on the ship. (On the next episode of My Antarctic Adventure: The Ship!)

Some final pics below as proof of the beauty and surrealism of Ushuaia: Fin Del Mundo, Principio Del Todo.


A brief tour of Ushuaia! Click for big!







And two panoramas:
Ushuaia from the Airport
Ushuaia from the Deck of the Polar Star

Read More...

2 comments: